This qualitative study explored: (a) How do the three English-Education-major (EE hereafter) undergraduates perceive their academic self-efficacy change experiences over the first two years after major transfer? (b) What are the personal and social factors that prompt their academic self-efficacy change? Data was collected from three EE students at S University in S city, China. Data sources include semi-structured interviews, reflections, and observation notes. Data analysis uses qualitative content analysis, adopting an inductive approach to allow themes to naturally emerge from the data. Findings reveal that participants experienced academic self-efficacy changes through continuous and uneasy processes. Significant changes were noted in the participants’ academic self-efficacy. Key personal factors, including mastery experiences and physiological/emotional states, along with social factors, including verbal and social persuasion and vicarious experiences, were found to substantially influence self-efficacy. In light of the above findings, practical implications were proposed for EE programs and program developers from the three aspects: creating opportunities for mastery experiences within EE programs, incorporating elements of social persuasion and vicarious learning, and integrating modules focused on managing anxiety and fostering resilience. Limitations of this study and recommendations for future research were discussed.

Early childhood is a critical period for growth and language development, including the ability to communicate effectively. In modern educational institutions, alongside Indonesian as the mother tongue, English is often introduced as a foreign language. Teaching English to young children is approached through engaging and educational activities designed to enhance their language skills. This study employs Participatory Action Research (PAR) involving 41 kindergarten students as participants. Effective methods include singing, reading bilingual storybooks, giving instructions in English, and role-playing. Singing helps children recognize English sounds and rhythms naturally, while bilingual storybooks enrich vocabulary by linking English words to familiar contexts. Role-playing, particularly bilingual mini-theater, stands out as a prominent method. In this activity, children interact using a mix of Indonesian and English dialogues, fostering both language skills and enjoyment. By participating in such dialogues, they deepen their understanding of English words in context. Additionally, instructions given in English during role-play help children familiarize themselves with hearing and responding to the language, promoting internalization. The findings highlight that the bilingual mini-theater approach fosters a dynamic learning environment that promotes vocabulary acquisition, expressive communication, and practical language application. These creative activities make learning interactive and enjoyable, effectively supporting early childhood English language development.

Speaking is one of the most challenging skills in studying English, raising concerns among many English teachers about how to help improve their students’ speaking performance. While many shy students prefer to work individually, others indicate their competence in group work. Therefore, this study investigates the effect of group discussion in authentic role-play on the speaking performance of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) young learners at a suburban primary school in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Participants in this study include 80 students: an experimental group (N=40) and a control group (N=40). During six weeks of the role-play session, experimental group students will work in groups, whereas the control group’s participants will prepare individually. Pre-tests and post-tests were employed to examine the students’ speaking performance, and interviews are conducted to compare students’ perceptions of the two role-play formats. The results from the speaking test show that the scores of the experimental group were higher than those of the control group. In the experimental group, five components are improved: pronunciation, content, vocabulary, grammar, and fluency. In contrast, only three components (pronunciation, content, and grammar) are enhanced in the control group. The findings from the interviews revealed that students of both group discussion and individual work engaged in role-play activities and substantially improved their language skills. However, they also faced some challenges in effectively using the two formats of role-play during speaking lessons.