A Mixed-Methods Approach to Students’ Engagement in English Learning in the Chinese Context
Since language use is at the center of language learning, learners’ active engagement in learning activities is crucial for successful language .
- Pub. date: March 15, 2024
- Pages: 1-11
- 270 Downloads
- 1255 Views
- 0 Citations
- #Agentic engagement
- # Chinese students
- # engagement
- # English as a foreign language
- # mixed-methods research.
Since language use is at the center of language learning, learners’ active engagement in learning activities is crucial for successful language learning. Answering the call for positive language education, the present study investigated the levels and influencing factors of engagement in English learning among 437 Chinese senior high school students. This study employed an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design, collecting data through questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. The results showed that students were generally well-engaged in English learning. Moreover, students were more inclined to engage in English learning behaviorally, emotionally, and cognitively. Students’ agentic engagement in English learning was relatively low and mainly reflected after English classes. The relatively low agentic engagement might be shaped by a series of personal and contextual factors, including the traditional Chinese concept of “honoring and respecting the teacher”, teachers’ teaching strategies, students’ learning strategies, English proficiency, learning climate, and teaching styles. Pedagogical implications for English teachers concerning enhancing students’ English learning engagement were provided.
agentic engagement chinese students engagement english as a foreign language mixed methods research
Keywords: Agentic engagement, Chinese students, engagement, English as a foreign language, mixed-methods research.
0
References
Almusharraf, N. M., & Bailey, D. (2021). Online engagement during COVID-19: Role of agency on collaborative learning orientation and learning expectations. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(5), 1285-1295. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12569
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (2012). Epilogue. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 813⁃817). Springer.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Dewaele, J. M., & Li, C. (2021). Teacher enthusiasm and students’ social-behavioral learning engagement: The mediating role of student enjoyment and boredom in Chinese EFL classes. Language Teaching Research, 25(6), 922-945. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211014538
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Express.
Eren, A., & Rakıcıoğlu-Söylemez, A. (2020). Language mindsets, perceived instrumentality, engagement and graded performance in English as a foreign language students. Language Teaching Research, 27(3), 544-574. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820958400
Fang, Y., Kang, Y., Teng, L., Lin, L., & Qiu, P. (2024). A qualitative study on the caregiver burden experience in home reflux enema management of infants with congenital megacolon. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 19(1), https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2023.2289225
Finn, J. D., & Rock, D. A. (1997). Academic success among students at risk for school failure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.221
Fredricks, J. A. , Blumenfeld, P. C. , & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Guo, Y. (2021). Exploring the dynamic interplay between foreign language enjoyment and learner engagement with regard to EFL achievement and absenteeism: A sequential mixed methods study. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 766058. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.766058
Halili, S. H., Rahman, N. H. A., & Razak, R. A. (2018). Traditional versus virtual learning: How engaged are the students in learning English literature? Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 79-90. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v8i1.11467
Harbour, K. E., Evanovich, L. L., Sweigart, C. A., & Hughes, L. E. (2015). A brief review of effective teaching practices that maximize student engagement. Preventing School Failure, 59(1), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2014.919136
Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A. H., Vitta, J. P., & Wu, J. (2021). Engagement in language learning: A systematic review of 20 years of research methods and definitions. Language Teaching Research, 28(1), 201-230. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211001289
Jiang, A. L., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). University teachers’ teaching style and their students’ agentic engagement in EFL learning in China: A self-determination theory and achievement goal theory integrated perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 704269. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.704269
Lee, J. S. (2014). The relationship between student engagement and academic performance: Is it a myth or reality? Journal of Educational Research, 107(3), 177-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2013.807491
Liu, H., Li, J., & Fang, F. (2022). Examining the complexity between boredom and engagement in English Learning: Evidence from Chinese high school students. Sustainability, 14, Article 16920. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416920
Liu, H., & Song, X. (2021). Exploring “Flow” in young Chinese EFL learners’ online English learning activities. System, 96, Article 102425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102425
MacIntyre, P. D., Gregersen, T., & Mercer, S. (2016). Positive psychology in SLA. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783095360
Marks, H. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 153-184. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312037001153
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1995). Designing qualitative research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2008). Academic buoyancy: Towards an understanding of students’ everyday academic resilience. Journal of School Psychology, 46(1), 53-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2007.01.002
Mercer, S. (2019). Language learner engagement: Setting the scene. In X. Gao (Ed.), Second handbook of English language teaching (pp. 1-19). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58542-0_40-1
Muir, C. (2020). Directed motivational currents and language education: Exploring implications for pedagogy. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788928861
Philp, J., & Duchesne, S. (2016). Exploring engagement in tasks in the language classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 50-72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190515000094
Qiu, X., & Cheng, H. (2021). The effects of task types on L2 oral production and learner engagement. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 60(4), 1063-1088. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2020-0128
Qiu, X., & Lo, Y. Y. (2017). Content familiarity, task repetition and Chinese EFL learners’ engagement in second language use. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 681-698. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816684368
Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149-172). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_7
Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579-595. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032690
Reeve, J., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Self-determination theory: A dialectical framework for understanding the sociocultural influences on student motivation. In D. McInerney & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning: Big theories revisited (pp. 31–59). Information Age.
Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002
Ryan, J. F. (2005). Institutional expenditures and student engagement: A role for financial resources in enhancing student learning and development? Research in Higher Education, 46(2), 235-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-1601-x
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Sang, Y., & Hiver, P. (2021). Engagement and companion constructs in language learning: Conceptualizing learners’ involvement in the L2 classroom. In P. Hiver, A. H. Al-Hoorie, & S. Mercer (Eds.), Student engagement in the language classroom (pp. 17–37). Multilingual Matters.
Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. Artia Books.
Sulis, G. (2023). Exploring learner engagement with languages (LX) within and beyond the English classroom. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688231216869
Svalberg, A. M. L. (2009). Engagement with language: Interrogating a construct. Language Awareness, 18(3), 242–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410903197264
Wang, Y., & Liu, H. (2022). The mediating roles of buoyancy and boredom in the relationship between autonomous motivation and engagement among Chinese senior high school EFL learners. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 992279. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.992279
Zhang, Z. V., & Hyland, K. (2022). Fostering student engagement with feedback: An integrated approach. Assessing Writing, 51, Article 100586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100586